Module 2 Overview#
Theme#
Bias, fairness, and representational harm
Essential Question#
How do datasets and objectives encode inequity?
Module Components#
Book prose: conceptual framing, domain scenario, methods, and failure modesAssignment: evidence-backed production of a specific artifactSlides: presentation sequence for seminar or lecture deliveryNarration: spoken version of the slide flowInstructor notes: facilitation plan, discussion prompts, and grading cuesRubric: criteria for evaluating the module artifactNotebook: executable lab aligned with the module theme using synthetic governance case facts including affected groups, data rights, transparency controls, and harm scenarios
Module Artifact#
responsible AI review memo with risk register, policy analysis, and redress plan focused on bias, fairness, and representational harm: Audit a model scenario for bias pathways and mitigations.
Professional Setting#
Students work as if advising an AI governance board reviewing a proposed high-impact AI deployment. Their work must be intelligible to governance chair, legal counsel, affected-user advocate, product owner, and compliance officer.